🔗 Share this article

Iturns out he was able to withstand a loss to Grimsby. He weathered an important European final against a particularly poor Spurs sides in living memory. He withstood losing at home to West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s most promising homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, calling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to tango. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

And frankly, this entire painful saga seems to paint the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint of experience with the Saints, to view Jason Wilcox as little more than a drudge in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself to be among football's true generals: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

A Strategic Clash Over System & Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of international appearances and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his thought processes to the rest of us. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director speaks rarely publicly, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – simply operate on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to receive.

An Ultimate Authority In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a back four. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace analytics and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and as we all know, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of a new striker?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. But how many companies have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not really creating the product, but still ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged whereas those individuals who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain untouchable, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the system coach and then fire him for playing too much that system. Hire the process guy and then bin him for requiring too long. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.